Poll results: Last look, lack of time-stamp and internalisation of flows – Which practice is most open to abuse?


A few weeks ago, we explored last look’, ‘time stamping’ and ‘internalisation’three practices that The Fair and Effective Markets Review FEMR, felt needed improved controls to help restore trust in FICC markets.

At the end of the post, I opened a poll asking buyside and sellside readers: “Which of the three practices are most open to abuse, resulting in sub-optimal client execution?”

The results, though limited and highly unscientific, are nonetheless interesting, as they highlight the almost diametrically opposite opinions of buyside and sellside. Buyside readers, overwhelmingly thought that the practice of ‘last-look’ was most open to abuse.

Whereas sellside readers, who are at the sharper end of this, felt that although last-look was open to abuse, ‘lack of time stamping orders/trades ‘was far more likely to result in sub-optimal client execution.

Poll results on Sellside practicesPoll results from unscientific and limited study asking “Which of the three practices are most open to abuse, resulting in sub-optimal client execution?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: