The business case for SDPs remains strong


Single-Dealer Platforms, were once the preserve of the global top-tier ‘flow monster’ banks such as Deutsche, Citi, Barclays and UBS. Requiring board level sponsorship and mega investment to build and maintain leading edge e-trading franchises.

Based on back of envelope stuff, I would suggest that over the past decade, each of the top five global FX banks would have spent in the region of $600-800mln to build, enhance and upgrade their e-trading technology capabilities.

Yet, despite this huge investment, the FX market share of the top five global banks has actually fallen by nearly 1% between 2008 and 2013 from 58.21% to 57.36%, with Deutsche being the biggest loser (down 6.52%) and Citi the biggest gainer (up 7.41%), as discussed in the EuroMoney 2013 FX polls.

So, why aren’t these banks gaining market share, and if they aren’t who is and why?

When we look at the lower ranked banks in the EuroMoney FX Polls, we see that they have made gains over the same period at the expense of the top five banks, as the chart below shows.

FX Market Share bandsChanges in FX market Share between 2008-2013 groups of the top 50 FX banks

So, what’s happening here? Some quick thoughts on some of the dynamics at play here are:

Many more regional banks have been investing in their own electronic trading and SDP distribution capabilities, and the business justification, SDP vision and ROI for these investments has become stronger based on a combination of factors which include:

    • Migration of ‘e-trading talent’ from global banks to regional banks
    • Lower cost of ownership, and faster time to market for deploying initial SDP framework and adding new products
    • Lower cost of sales/client coverage by migrating from high touch voice to scalable low touch e-trading
    • Greater ‘Sales Trader functionality’ and MIS data mining available to support high value clients
    • Greater levels of differentiation, stickiness and client loyalty achieved through well designed client centric SDP

Interestingly, in Risk.Net Barclays David Wood (Director of Investor Solutions) talks about their Structured Products platform Comet, and makes some interesting points, which today apply to smaller banks building their SDPs as well:

….Barclay’s launched the Comet online structured product platform in 2010 as a way to deliver its range of structured products to wealth managers around the world.

“There weren’t that many third-party platforms at the time,”. ….By building its own web-based distribution tool, Barclays found it could reach new clients and deliver its products to them more cheaply.

The bank immediately saw an explosion in the number of quotes wealth managers and private bankers were requesting, says Wood. “From a client point of view, Comet dramatically changed the way they could behave. Previously, we would send out grids of product ideas and clients would call in with specific requests. But there was no dynamic way for clients to tailor their own requests,” he says.

The single-dealer environment continues to be a place where banks can innovate in the products and services they offer clients

Today, Caplin’s clients are benefiting from the same value from their SDPs as banks like Barclays, but at a fraction of the cost. In April, we won an award for the ‘Best Implementation’ at a sell side firm  for ZKBs eTrading Pro, web based Structured Products platform!

There is more to say on the business drivers and value proposition for investing in an SDP, which we will cover in future posts, especially in light of regulatory changes.

5 Responses

  1. Great post, Paul.

  2. […] The business case for SDPs remains strong Single-Dealer Platforms, were once the preserve of the global top-tier ‘flow monster’ banks such as Deutsche, Citi, Barclays and UBS. Requiring board level sponsorship and mega investment to build and maintain leading edge e-trading franchises. https://singledealerplatforms.org/2013/07/19/the-business-case-for-sdps-remains-strong/ […]

  3. […] However, here at Caplin, we have a number of SDP projects with regional banks that have connected to all back end pricing and risk systems, and gone live with corporate clients in around 6mths, for well under 10pct, probably closer to 5% of what a global top tier bank would spend, which is why the business case for SDPs remains strong. […]

  4. […] such a direct relationship with clients, enables banks to data mine client MIS usage of the SDP.  In this way, they can analyse client buying preferences (read here ‘trading […]

  5. […] principal based businesses and reducing their proprietary trading. As a result, the business case for regional banks investing in their client facing single-dealer platforms has actually never been stronger, and is delivering […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: