What’s so great about internalising FX flows?


What’s so great about internalising FX flows?

In an earlier blog article separating the men from the boys in global FX I touched on internalisation of FX flow. It’s worth looking again at why this is so important to banks that are building an eFX business.

By internalising flows, banks seek to internally match (uncorrelated) flows originating from clients, branches, internal prop desks, and market making hedge positions. Previously such positions would either have been auto hedged through an external venue, left as residual market maker risk positions, or dealt on another platform (lost business).

For banks with large international branch networks, it’s not uncommon to find high volumes of low value commercial transactions ‘leaking’ out to competitor bank platforms. But, by funneling such trades through to the internal matching engine, banks can plug the leaks, and provide better services to internal branches or external clients.

At the other end of the spectrum, for banks servicing clients seeking to execute high value trades, such internalisation enables these trades to be executed with very little if any market impact, meaning that clients get ‘their amount’ done, with minimal market impact and information leakage, and less residual market making risk to the bank.

Recent comments from Barclays Capital in Euromoney support this view by stating that up to 80% of their FX spot business is now transacted on their own BARX platform, and that they manage to internalise a huge proportion of that flow.

As I see it, the benefits to the bank of internalising FX flows are:

    • Higher profits through capturing a greater proportion of the bid-ask spread on FX flows
    • Lower brokerage costs, and reduced reliance on external liquidity pools
    • Deeper more consistent liquidity available to clients even in volatile conditions

Seems like internalising flows is a win-win, and can quickly become a virtuous circle, where order flow and liquidity begat more liquidity, creating a reliable and deeper pool of internal liquidity, which the bank can offer out to clients.

As always, the catch is in execution. It’s not easy to set up the infrastructure to support such internalisation, which takes me back to my previous blog title, separating the men from the boys!

7 Responses

  1. […] a previous blog comment internalising FX flow I touched on how internalising FX flows, can actually help to minimise the risk of a liquidity […]

  2. […] flow”, and reduce the need to hedge positions in the external interbank market. (Link to my previous blog on internalising FX flows) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)eFX volumes Single Dealer Platforms vs Multi […]

  3. […] But for many others, the investment in SDPs is being done to build stronger relationships with clients, gain more flow, which can be highly profitable to banks that have the ability to fully internalize these FX flows (see what’s so great about internalising FX flows?). […]

  4. […] See previous post on internalisation (here) […]

  5. […] pair and time, the toxicity of the flows, and the proportion of that clients flow they are able to internalise, (some major banks internalise upwards of 80-90% of client flows) and then model the overall […]

  6. […] discussed the value of internalising FX flows, a while ago, and looked at how the ability of major banks to internalise their FX flows was […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: