Posted on October 3, 2014 by Paul Blank
Could clearing mandate for NDFs be closer that we think?
Europe has tended to lag the US by about 18 months in implementing regulatory reforms in general, and trading and clearing mandates in particular.
So, the timing this week of a new consultation paper by The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on mandatory clearing of swaps and Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs) is potentially significant, as it could suggest a more rapid convergence between Europe and US on NDF clearing mandates.
The reason for this is that the paper has been published barely a week before Continue reading
Filed under: Paul Blank, Regulation, SEF, Web trading technology | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 30, 2014 by Paul Blank
The Swiss based Financial Stability Board (FSB), has today published their final report and recommendations for Foreign Exchange Benchmarks, which follows an initial consultative report published in July.
The report sets out a number of recommendations for reform in the FX markets and in the benchmark rates that have been identified as pre-eminent by market participants – in particular, the WM/Reuters (WMR) 4pm London fix produced by the WM Company. These recommendations fall into the following broad categories:
- the calculation methodology of the WMR benchmark rates;
- recommendations from a review by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) of the WM fixes – this review is included in the report published today, and is also being published separately by IOSCO;
- the publication of reference rates by central banks;
- market infrastructure in relation to the execution of fix trades; and
- the behavior of market participants around the time of the major FX benchmarks (primarily the WMR 4pm London fix).
Summary of recommendations Continue reading
Filed under: Best Execution, FX, Paul Blank, Regulation | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 24, 2014 by Paul Blank
Regulation is driving change in capital market structure, and as highlighted in the future of investment banking, banks continue to move towards a ‘capital-lite’ business model, as they seek to ‘optimise’ use of and return on capital.
The introduction of mandatory trading and clearing for standardised swaps (SEFs in US and OTF and MTFs in Europe) has resulted in higher capital charges for OTC bilateral trades, and reduced the appetite of banks to warehouse and hold inventory which is moving more banks towards a ‘capital lite’ model.
This is the backdrop to the announcement that JP Morgan the setting up a 150 strong fixed income agency execution desk called JP Morgan Execution Services (JPMES), to run alongside its principal trading operations.
At first sight, it looks as if JP Morgan is simply hedging its bets and backing both agency and principal business models. However,
Filed under: CCP, OTF, Paul Blank, Regulation, SEF, SWAPS, Web trading technology | Leave a comment »
Posted on June 24, 2014 by Paul Blank
What’s the outlook for Investment Banking in 2014 and beyond?
Well, according to a new report published by Oliver Wyman and Morgan Stanley, banks need to act fast and re-allocate capital and resources to optimise where they have real advantage, and focus regionally and domestically.
The report which includes results of client surveys suggests clients plan to ‘polarize’ their spend on partner banks and specialists in areas such as servicing multi-asset, whilst squeezing the rest.
This is a really fascinating report (link available at end of this post), well worth taking the time to read, some key takeaways from the report are:
Market under-estimates scope for wholesale banks to increase returns as they are forced to focus on business optimisation and resource allocations
Drivers being: Continue reading
Filed under: Paul Blank, Regulation, Survey Results | 1 Comment »
Posted on March 3, 2014 by Paul Blank
Last week I attended the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) 9th annual European Market Liquidity Conference.
As always with AFME, there had some thoughtful speakers and topical panel discussions, as well as providing good forum for networking opportunities (including providing for the conference iPad’s pre-loaded with delegate names allowing you to reach out to them and make contact).
This year’s agenda focused on the new emerging market structures
- Liquidity in the new regulated market – the changing market structure
- Keynote address -Verena Ross, Exec Dir, ESMA
- Foreign Exchange:
The renminbi and other Asian currencies
Impact of regulation on development of the FX market place
- Fixed Income:
Development of exchange capabilities
Liquidity issue, what liquidity issue?
- Funding European economic growth: the obstacles and opportunities
Below are my notes and some comments from the sessions that I attended: Continue reading
Filed under: CCP, Dodd Frank, FX, OTC, OTF, Paul Blank, Regulation, SEF, SWAPS | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 21, 2014 by Paul Blank
This week saw the introduction of mandatory execution on new SEF platforms for certain standardised interest rate swaps. Such swaps will no longer be executed bilaterally between banks and their clients, but rather must be executed anonymously on SEFs.
The move to SEF trading has however been tentative, with many buy-side firms holding back, nonetheless by midweek some 74% of the 372 IRS trades were being executed on SEFs, according to data from Clarus. Although there are 23 newly registered SEFs , the majority of business so far has tended to flow through to the incumbent inter-dealer platform SEFs.
But what about single-dealer platforms (SDP), how are banks managing the migration to SEF trading? Continue reading
Filed under: CEP, CFTC, Dodd Frank, OTC, Paul Blank, Regulation, SEF, SWAPS | 1 Comment »
Posted on January 20, 2014 by Paul Blank
Interesting news just out that UBS is to outsource part of their fixed income technology infrastructure to Murex for booking trades and running valuations and to ION for market connectivity gateways and pricing tools.
This decision seems a direct consequence of the increasing costs of in-house development and ongoing support and enhancement of numerous legacy platforms, and the regulatory pressure and higher capital costs that banks are facing, and that has resulted in Continue reading
Filed under: Paul Blank, Regulation, Web trading technology | 1 Comment »